Knowledge Graph

What the Knowledge Graph
actually is.

AgentLed's Knowledge Graph is a structured memory layer that stores entities, relationships, scoring history, and workflow outcomes across all runs in a workspace.

It is not just a database and not just prompt memory. It is a graph of business knowledge that workflows and agents can read from and write to over time, so future decisions use prior context instead of starting from zero.

Tenant-isolated workspace memoryQueryable via MCP and APIShared by workflows and agents
Knowledge Graph at a glanceworkspace memory

Nodes

companies, people, deals

Edges

scored, matched, contacted

History

scores, rationale, outcomes

Access

workflows, agents, MCP

Why it matters

When a customer asks, “Have we seen this investor before?” or “What happened with similar startups last time?”, the answer comes from structured memory, not guesswork.

1. What is it?

A business memory layer, not a marketing metaphor.

The Knowledge Graph stores the objects your business cares about, how they relate to one another, and what your workflows learned about them. That memory compounds over time.

Entities

Companies, investors, startups, contacts, deals, and any other business object your workflows work with.

Relationships

Typed edges like SCORED, CONTACTED, MATCHED, or INVESTED_IN that connect entities across runs.

Scoring history

Past scores, rationales, and outcomes that let future runs calibrate decisions instead of starting cold.

Workspace memory

Tenant-isolated context shared across workflows, agents, and MCP/API access in the same workspace.

2. Workflows

How workflows read from it, write to it, and improve with it.

The workflow layer is where the graph becomes useful. Runs do not only produce output — they also update shared memory for the next run.

Write

Every workflow run can add knowledge

Execution results become durable context: enriched contacts, scored leads, matched investors, discovered relationships, and final outcomes.

Read

Future runs can query prior context

A workflow can ask: have we scored this entity before, what happened last time, which relationships already exist, and what was learned from previous outcomes?

Compound learning

The system improves because history is reusable

Instead of repeating the same analysis from scratch, each run builds on what earlier runs already discovered and validated.

Workflow run

Enrich startup, score investor, or qualify a lead.

Write to KG

Store entities, scores, relationships, rationale, and outcomes.

Next run reads

Use prior context before making the next decision.

Typical write examples

  • Scored leads with rationale and conversion status
  • Enriched company and contact records
  • Investor-startup matches and final outcomes

Typical read questions

  • Have we scored this investor before?
  • What happened with similar startups last time?
  • Which enriched leads still need outreach?

3. Agents

How agents use the Knowledge Graph.

Agents use the graph as persistent business context. That matters in both chat and autonomous execution: the agent can retrieve past decisions, store new findings, and share them with the rest of the workspace.

Agents query the graph during work

Agents can read workspace memory while chatting with users or completing autonomous tasks.

Context persists across sessions

Agent memory is backed by the Knowledge Graph, so decisions and findings do not disappear when a session ends.

Findings are shared across agents

One agent can store an evaluation and another agent can reuse it later without redoing the same analysis.

Multi-agent work becomes coordinated

Research, sourcing, matching, and outreach agents all operate on the same business memory layer.

Multi-agent example

Sourcing agent

Evaluates a startup and stores thesis fit, sector notes, and scoring rationale in the KG.

Matching agent

Reads that evaluation later when looking for investors, so it starts with known context instead of redoing the same research.

This is the practical difference between separate agents and coordinated agents: one agent's findings become available to all agents in the workspace through the same memory layer.

4. Examples

Concrete examples of how value compounds.

The point of the graph is not abstract “memory.” The point is that repeated work becomes more informed, more coordinated, and less wasteful.

Lead enrichment and outreach

Week 1

Enrichment writes to the graph

  • A workflow enriches a lead and stores the company, contacts, and status in the KG.
  • The team now has a durable record of who was found and what was learned.
  • No one needs to reconstruct that work from inboxes or spreadsheets.

Week 2

Outreach reads before acting

  • The outreach workflow queries: which leads were enriched but not contacted?
  • It avoids duplicate work and focuses only on the missing next actions.
  • Operations stay coordinated across separate workflows and team members.

Why it matters: Work does not fragment between runs because the workflow state lives in shared memory.

Investor scoring

Run 1

Static profile only

  • Investor X is scored from current profile data and thesis fit.
  • No prior committee outcomes or calibration patterns are available.
  • The score is directionally useful, but still generic.

Run 8

Score uses actual history

  • The KG now contains 7 prior scoring records for the same investor.
  • Two IC outcomes are available: one committed, one passed.
  • Sector-specific calibration insights make the score more accurate and less generic.

Why it matters: The value is not one score. The value is a score that gets better as real outcomes accumulate.

Startup sourcing

First batch

Initial screening

  • A workflow scores 50 startups against the fund thesis.
  • Results are written to the KG with scores, rationales, and metadata.
  • This creates the first calibration layer for that sourcing motion.

Second batch

Screening with calibration context

  • The next batch reads similar startup patterns from previous runs.
  • The system notices that similar sector profiles scored 60–70 but never converted.
  • Expectations adjust before more time is spent on weak matches.

Why it matters: The KG turns repeated sourcing into a learning loop instead of a repeated manual exercise.

5. Comparison

What the Knowledge Graph adds beyond traditional automation tools.

n8n, Zapier, and Make can orchestrate steps. The Knowledge Graph adds durable business context across executions.

Capabilityn8nZapierMakeAgentLed KG
Shared memory across runsNoNoNoYes — persistent business memory
Relationship graph between entitiesManualManualManualBuilt in
Scoring history and outcome trackingNot nativeNot nativeNot nativeBuilt in
Cross-workflow context reuseLimitedLimitedLimitedShared across workspace
Agents can query memory directlyNoNoNoYes — via MCP and workflow tools
Compound learning from outcomesCustom buildCustom buildCustom buildNative pattern

6. Technical access

How to give your agent access to your business context.

The graph is accessible through MCP tools, AgentLed's API surface, and the CLI/MCP server. That makes it usable both inside workflows and from external technical tooling.

MCP tools

query_kg_edges

Traverse relationships for an entity and inspect how companies, people, deals, or scores connect.

get_knowledge_rows

Read structured rows from a knowledge list that workflows store and update across runs.

get_scoring_history

Fetch past scoring decisions and outcomes to calibrate the next decision.

get_knowledge_text

Retrieve text-based knowledge such as ICP notes, investment theses, or operating rules.

Programmatic access

  • Use MCP from Claude Code, Codex, or any compatible client.
  • Query graph-backed workspace data from workflow steps and agent sessions.
  • Combine graph reads with live integrations, AI actions, and workflow execution.

Your first workflow builds your first memory.

Share this page with a technical contact, then show them the workflow. The Knowledge Graph is the layer that makes each next run more informed than the last.